Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 May 2004 02:56:14 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission |
| |
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:41:55PM -0400, Francis J. A. Pinteric wrote:
> Personally, I'd like to see this evolve into something along the lines > of ISO-9000. If linux development can have the ability to create > detailed audit trails of code changes there would never be a question > about who contributed what and who owns it. > > It would be nice if some sort of ISO-9000 compliance were a long term > goal here. The proprietary software houses would go nuts.
Why would we care whether they go nuts or not? We would go nuts, now _that_ I do care about.
> >>>---fja-> > > > -- > If you think what I'm saying is "politically incorrect",
No, just plain stupid.
> you've got the wrong politics. > > Tired of `netiquette'?
Not really. *plonk* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |