lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:41:55PM -0400, Francis J. A. Pinteric wrote:

> Personally, I'd like to see this evolve into something along the lines
> of ISO-9000. If linux development can have the ability to create
> detailed audit trails of code changes there would never be a question
> about who contributed what and who owns it.
>
> It would be nice if some sort of ISO-9000 compliance were a long term
> goal here. The proprietary software houses would go nuts.

Why would we care whether they go nuts or not? We would go nuts, now
_that_ I do care about.

> >>>---fja->
>
>
> --
> If you think what I'm saying is "politically incorrect",

No, just plain stupid.

> you've got the wrong politics.
>
> Tired of `netiquette'?

Not really. *plonk*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.061 / U:1.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site