lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clarify message and give support contact for non-GPL modules
Date

On May 2, 2004, at 9:05 AM, Paul Rolland wrote:
>
> Agreed. Once you have loaded such a module, your kernel is really
> "tainted" by something that cannot really be controlled.
> Proprietary is too much neutral and doesn't reflect what you are
> now running : some piece of code which may by bloated without anyone
> being able to control it.

There will always be things in life that cannot be controlled. The
kernel already depends on (by being called by, or itself calling)
uncontrolled proprietary code in many environments without telling
users about it. Informing people about this is perfectly ok,
unnecessarily scaring or confusing them is not.

> I simply hope that some "vendors" will not alter kernel code before
> building to remove such a warning if they include closed source
> module in their distro.

Very good point. You can make things as negative-sounding, politically
hostile as you want, but Linux distribution vendors would be perfectly
free under the GPL to modify the kernel to remove or attenuate
exaggerated messages and any other hostile measures if necessary.

If the messages are reasonable and clear, no-one will want/try to
remove or avoid them, and people will be properly informed.

Marc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.086 / U:2.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site