Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 May 2004 19:49:23 +0200 | From | Rutger Nijlunsing <> | Subject | Re: 1352 NUL bytes at the end of a page? (was Re: Assertion `s && s->tree' failed: The saga continues.) |
| |
> > An easy way to verify for Steven is to give a quick spin to 2.6.5-aa5 > > and see if it's slow too, that will rule out the anon-vma changes > > (for completeness: there's a minor race in 2.6.5-aa5 fixed in my current > > internal tree, I posted the fix to l-k separately, but you can ignore > > the fix for a simple test, it takes weeks to trigger anyways and you > > need threads to trigger it and I've never seen threaded version control > > systems so I doubt BK is threaded). > > I'm getting the linux-2.6.5.tar.bz2 file (already got 2.6.5-aa2) via ppp, > while running the bk test script on 2.6.6-current and no PREEMPT. > That takes a while on 56k dialup. I'll leave all that running while > I go hiking.
ketchup should get you faster to 2.6.5 vanilla...
-- Rutger Nijlunsing ---------------------------- rutger ed tux tmfweb nl never attribute to a conspiracy which can be explained by incompetence ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |