Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 May 2004 10:29:36 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [OT] "bk pull" does not update my sources...? |
| |
On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:13:41 +0200 Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de> wrote:
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | Hash: SHA1 | | walt schrieb: | |> evil@sheep:/usr/src/linux-2.6-BK$ head -n5 Makefile | |> VERSION = 2 | |> PATCHLEVEL = 6 | |> SUBLEVEL = 6 | |> EXTRAVERSION = | | | | This is correct. Linus does not include the 'bk' in the 'extraversion' | | field. | | so, the Makefile from the -bk snapshots (e.g. patch-2.6.6-bk1.bz2) was | edited and will show an EXTRAVERSION of "-bk1", while the original | Makefile does not? this is insane!
Right. The bk tree does not contain -bkN or anything in the EXTRAVERSION string. The bk snapshots do add that string.
I don't find it hard to keep them separated, but, yeah, that's the way it is.
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |