Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 May 2004 17:28:44 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [patch] kill off PC9800 |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > Well it's a question of whether we're likely to see increasing demand for > [pc9800] in the future. If so then it would be prudent to put some effort into > fixing it up rather than removing it. > > Seems that's not the case. I don't see a huge rush on this but if after > this discussion nobody steps up to take care of the code over the next few > weeks, it's best to remove it.
Although I like deleting things as much as the next guy :) I do have a question, to which I haven't come up with a good answer myself:
Should PC9800 be excised en masse, or just toss the obviously broken or not-in-any-makefile/Kconfig pieces?
The PC9800 net driver stuff still seems to build, and be sane.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |