Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 May 2004 15:48:52 -0400 | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.6-rc3-mm2 (4KSTACK) |
| |
Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>>"4KSTACKS" already is present in the module version string. >>> >>>And Fedora is shipping now with 4k stacks, so presumably any disasters >>>are relatively uncommon... >> >>Fedora and kernel.org have a lot of unshared bugs and features, >>unfortunately. I take that information as an encouraging proof of concept, >>not a waranty that the kernel.org code will behave in a similar way. > > > Hey! That's slander of title! :-) > Seriously the difference between the Fedora Core 2 kernel and the > matching kernel.org kernel aren't THAT big. The 4g/4g split patch being > the biggest delta. > I was thinking about the one you charge for... I wouldn't use FCn for production on a bet. I was thinking of my RHEL AS3.0 vs. kernel.org, which are kernels stable enough for commercial use.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |