Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 May 2004 14:38:59 +0200 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement |
| |
On Mon, 10 May 2004 18:17:40 -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > > I now use ino_t and dev_t , though in struct inode, i_no is unsigned > long?
Correct. That definition should be changed as well, I just didn't care enough to submit a patch yet. Anyway, old mistakes never justify new mistakes.
Jörn
-- People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin Franklin said it first. -- unknown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |