Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:16:29 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: NUMA API for Linux |
| |
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:51:30 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Just from the patches you posted, I would really disagree that these are > > ready for merging into -mm. > > I have them all merged up here. I made a number of small changes - > additional CONFIG_NUMA ifdefs, whitespace improvements, remove unneeded > arch_hugetlb_fault() implementation. The core patch created two copies of > the same file in mempolicy.h, compile fix in mmap.c and a few other things.
Sorry about the bad patches. I will try to be more careful in the future.
What was the problem in mmap.c ? I compiled in various combinations (with and without NUMA on i386 and x86-64) and it worked.
And why was arch_hugetlb_fault() unneeded?
> It builds OK for NUMAQ, although NUMAQ does have a problem: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_pci_root_add': > drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x22015): undefined reference to `pci_acpi_scan_root' > > ppc64+CONFIG_NUMA compiles OK.
ppc64 doesn't have the system calls hooked up, but I'm not sure how useful it would be for these boxes anyways (afaik they are pretty uniform)
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |