Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Apr 2004 23:49:50 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: -mmX 4G patches feedback |
| |
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:19:18PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Tuesday, April 06, 2004 00:16:41 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:35:23PM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote: > >> 4G of virtual address is what we need. Virtual address space is why the -mmX > >> 4G/4G patches are useful. In this application it is single processes (usually > > > > Indeed. > > > >> 3.5:1.5 appears to be a 2.4.x kernel patch only right? > > > > Martin has a port for 2.6 in the -mjb patchset (though it only works > > with PAE disabled but there are patches floating around to make it work > > at not noticeable cost with PAE enabled too). > > There's no such thing as 3.5:1.5. Do you mean 3.5:0.5? or 2.5:1.5? ;-)
I meant 3.5:0.5, that's the additional config option in 2.4-aa and in your tree too IIRC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |