Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:09:27 +0200 | From | Ralf Baechle <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_XIP_ROM vs. CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL |
| |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:07:17PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> I'm looking at some sources for kernel Execute-in-place (XIP). > > I see references to CONFIG_XIP_ROM and CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL, > in different architecture branches of the same kernel > source tree. > > Is this difference merely the result of inconsistent > usage, or is there a functional difference between > these two options? > > I can imagine that CONFIG_XIP_ROM is intended only to > handle XIP in ROM, and that CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL possibly > handles additional cases like XIP in flash. However, > before jumping to that conclusion I thought I would > ask if there is some intention behind the different > config names.
Since you copied linux-mips - neither option is implemented for MIPS ...
Ralf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |