Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:18:53 -0400 | From | Jon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license |
| |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > I don't see a need to get all complicated about this. > This is simple, really: since a C string ends at the > '\0', the module has been declared to be GPL code. > We shouldn't care if that C string is part of a larger > array. This is a damn obvious case of willful circumvention > of copyright control, access control, digital rights > management, etc. > > Unleash the sharks. > I did, you're on slashdot http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/27/1435217 -- Jon http://tesla.resnet.mtu.edu The only meaning in life is the meaning you create for it. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |