Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:28:37 +1200 | From | Andrew McGregor <> | Subject | Re: [somewhat OT] binary modules agaaaain |
| |
And it must, if only because there are laws that require some device drivers to be binary only.
I kid you not, take a look at the FCC software radio rules. Some wireless cards fall into their definition.
Wierd world, but there we go...
Andrew
--On Tuesday, 20 April 2004 5:08 p.m. +0200 Guennadi Liakhovetski <gl@dsa-ac.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> > A binary module is "considered good" if >> >> This is a false assumption IMO no binary only modules can be "good". > > I agree! That was just an idea to make Linux life easier __if__ it > __must__ live with binary modules. > > Thanks > Guennadi > --------------------------------- > Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. > DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH > Pascalstr. 28 > D-52076 Aachen > Germany > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >
--------- Andrew McGregor Director, Scientific Advisor IndraNet Technologies Ltd http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |