Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:09:34 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Rename PF_IOTHREAD. |
| |
Hi!
> A few weeks ago, Pavel and I agreed that PF_IOTHREAD should be renamed > to PF_NOFREEZE. This reflects the fact that some threads so marked > aren't actually used for IO while suspending, but simply shouldn't be > frozen. This patch, against 2.6.5 vanilla, applies that change. In the > refrigerator calls, the actual value doesn't matter (so long as it's > non-zero) and it makes more sense to use PF_FREEZE so I've used that. > > Please apply.
Patch looks good. [Except that I'm not sure if this hunk will apply; there were changes for ^Z in this area]. Pavel
> diff -ruN linux-2.6.5/kernel/power/process.c linux-2.6.5-NoFreeze/kernel/power/process.c > --- linux-2.6.5/kernel/power/process.c 2004-01-13 14:16:35.000000000 +1100 > +++ linux-2.6.5-NoFreeze/kernel/power/process.c 2004-04-19 16:47:24.000000000 +1000 > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ > static inline int freezeable(struct task_struct * p) > { > if ((p == current) || > - (p->flags & PF_IOTHREAD) || > + (p->flags & PF_NOFREEZE) || > (p->state == TASK_ZOMBIE) || > (p->state == TASK_DEAD)) > return 0;
-- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |