Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:06:16 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: vmscan.c heuristic adjustment for smaller systems |
| |
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:33:33PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> This doesn't match your first response. Anyway, this one is gets >> scrapped. I guess if swappiness solves it, then so much the better.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:52:57PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > Huh? Where do you see a discrepency? I don't think I claimed that > the test program performance changed. The noticeable difference is in > interactivity once the page cache fills. IMHO, 30 seconds to do a > file listing on /proc is extreme.
Oh, sorry, it was unclear to me that the test changed anything but swappiness (i.e. I couldn't tell they included the patch etc.)
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |