Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:28:33 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: SATA support merge in 2.4.27 |
| |
Since we are going over the cliff, lets get there faster!
Has 2.2 or 2.0 ever been audited for security issues, and fixed?
Whee this is fun!
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, John Bradford wrote:
> Quote from Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>: > > > > --=-De0mPL9BnMYZGB8TurTV > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 12:20, John Bradford wrote: > > > Quote from Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>: > > > > You are suggesting that 2.6 is not stable ? How could that be ? > > >=20 > > > It hasn't exactly been audited for security issues yet. > > > > neither has the biggest part of the 2.4 codebase. > > A valid point, but last time I checked, there were known exploits that had > been fixed in 2.4 but not in 2.6. > > John. >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |