lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: SATA support merge in 2.4.27

Since we are going over the cliff, lets get there faster!

Has 2.2 or 2.0 ever been audited for security issues, and fixed?

Whee this is fun!

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, John Bradford wrote:

> Quote from Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>:
> >
> > --=-De0mPL9BnMYZGB8TurTV
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 12:20, John Bradford wrote:
> > > Quote from Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>:
> > > > You are suggesting that 2.6 is not stable ? How could that be ?
> > >=20
> > > It hasn't exactly been audited for security issues yet.
> >
> > neither has the biggest part of the 2.4 codebase.
>
> A valid point, but last time I checked, there were known exploits that had
> been fixed in 2.4 but not in 2.6.
>
> John.
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.069 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site