Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: IO-APIC on nforce2 [PATCH] + [PATCH] for nmi_debug=1 + [PATCH] for idle=C1halt, 2.6.5 | From | Craig Bradney <> | Date | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:04:50 +0200 |
| |
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 22:17, Len Brown wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 11:10, Ross Dickson wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 April 2004 11:02, Len Brown wrote: > > > Re: IRQ0 XT-PIC timer issue > > > > > > Since the hardware is connected to APIC pin0, it is a BIOS bug > > > that an ACPI interrupt source override from pin2 to IRQ0 exists. > > > > > > With this simple 2.6.5 patch you can specify "acpi_skip_timer_override" > > > to ignore that bogus BIOS directive. The result is with your > > > ACPI-enabled APIC-enabled kernel, you'll get IRQ0 IO-APIC-edge timer. > > > > > > Probably there is a more clever way to trigger this workaround > > > automatcially instead of via boot parameter. > > > Hi Len, I have updated my nforce2 patches for 2.6.5 to work with your patch. > > I have tested them only on one nforce2 board Epox 8Rga+ but as little has > > changed in core functionality from past releases I think all will be OK.... > > Hopefully no clock skew. I saw none on my system but thats no guarantee. > > While I don't want to get into the business of maintaining > a dmi_scan entry for every system with this issue, I think > it might be a good idea to add a couple of example entries > for high volume systems for which there is no BIOS fix available. > > Got any opinions on which system to use as the example? > I'll need the output from dmidecode for them.
I have an A7N8X Deluxe v2 BIOS v1007 that I can give u whatever numbers u need. IOAPIC and APIC are on.
Its running gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.3-r1 plus the idlec1halt patch and nmi patch from Ross. I guess the kernel doesnt matter too much if its just board details.
More details of my 2.6.1 days are at http://atlas.et.tudelft.nl/verwei90/nforce2/
Craig
> > I tried your above patch with the timer_ack on as is default in 2.6.5 and > > nmi_watchdog=1 failed as expected. I still think Maciej's 8259 ack patch > > is more complete solution to the ack issue but this one gets watchdog going for > > nforce2. I cannot see anyone using your above patch without an integrated > > apic and tsc so I cannot see a problem triggering it off your kern arg. > > "acpi_skip_timer_override" is specific to IOAPIC mode, > since that is the only place that the bogus interrupt > source override is used. > > I'm not clued-in on the nmi_watchdog and 8259 ack issues. > My focus is primarily the ACPI issues involved in getting > these systems up and running in IOAPIC mode. > > > The second patch is the C1halt update I suggested in another posting. > > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-04/1707.html > > Clearly this hang issue is more important than the timer issue. > I'm impressed that you built such a sophisticated patch without > any support from the vendors. But it would be a "really good thing" > if we got some input from the vendors before considering putting > a workaround into the upstream kernel -- for they may have > guidance which would either simplify it, or make it unnecessary. > Perhaps Allen Martin at nVidia can comment? > > -Len > > > [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |