lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: NUMA API for Linux
From
Date
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 04:48, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:39:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:38:37 -0700
> > Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 2) Rename check_* to mpol_check_*
> >
> > I really don't understand why you insist on renaming all my functions?
> > I like the current naming, thank you.
> >
>
> I like the mpol_ flavors because there is no namespace collision
> on these. When I look at cscope or any other code analysis tool,
> I know that the mpol_... functions belong together. Makes
> investigating other people's code easier.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
> Robin Holt

That was my motivation. It's not particularly important, especially
since the functions are all declared static. I just thought they were a
little more readable when prefixed by mpol_.

-Matt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.031 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site