Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:23:23 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree |
| |
> Wherease my solution will allow multiple modifications at the same > time (if possible) with only one pageout routine at a time. I chose > this solution because Martin's SDET took big hit in common cases of > adding and removing vmas from the i_mmap{_shared} data structure.
FYI, even without prio-tree, I get a 12% boost from converting i_shared_sem into a spinlock. I'll try doing the same on top of prio-tree next.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |