Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:45:54 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: linux-2.6.5-mjb1 Comment. |
| |
> Test 2.6.5-mjb2 for more than 2 days only, system is pretty stable (the same as > almost all other 2.6.x with my box). The significant performance improved > compared to 2.6.5-aa5, 2.6.5 and all others 2.6.x for with a low end box line mine > (660 Mhx Celeron 256 Mb RAM) make me write this comment. :-) Wish that some > improvement could make way to the mainline kernel.
Good ;-) We're working on getting it integrated back in ... just a couple of outstanding corner cases need killing first.
> The memory management is nearly perfect. Before I tried one ck kernel use auto > regulation swap and it was still much worse than this one as I noticed the value > in swappiness also changes by the time.
Con's changes are in there, but they were updated once or twice, and there are bug fixes too. I still think it's the Right Thing to Do (tm).
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |