Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:11:47 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Calin A. Culianu" <> | Subject | Re: Shielded CPUs |
| |
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 16:23, Calin A. Culianu wrote: > > This might be a bit off-topic (and might belong in the rtlinux mailing > > list), but I wanted people's opinion on LKML... > > > > There's an article in the May 2004 Linux Journal about some CPU affinity > > features in Redhawk Linux that allow a process and a set of interrupts to > > be locked to a particular CPU for the purposes of improving real-time > > performance. > > well you can do both of those already in 2.6 and in all recent vendor > 2.4's that I know of..... no patches needed.
Cool.. it's still not, strictly speaking, _hard_ realtime, though, is it? Simply really good soft-realtime, right?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |