Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:13:13 +0800 (WST) | From | raven@themaw ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH] umount after bad chdir |
| |
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 raven@themaw.net wrote:
> > Mind you, chdir() patch in -mm is broken in a lot of other ways - e.g. > > it assumes that another thread sharing ->fs with us won't call chdir() > > in the wrong moment... > > Thanks for your interest Al. > > I see your point (I think). > > If I understand you correctly (please explain if I don't) I need to lock > the ->fs struct.
Mmm ... doesn't look much good in the light of Als comment.
Looks like it's not possible to take the lock for long enough even if I could.
Lets have some comments, criticisms or suggestions please.
Ian
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |