Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:45:54 +0200 | From | Marcus Hartig <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.5-mjb1 |
| |
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> The main thing that looks different is that loops per run is lower. > What does that mean?
Hmm. Sorry, here seems to be an error with my first run of the -mjb1 bench. Now, in the second try it has the loops running as the others, I think. And a good performance...
x11.log: cpu_hz = 2.0885e+09 cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645177 total latency = 1.953125 ms cpu latency = 1.562500 ms max diff = 3.06248 ms (overrun 0) within 1ms = 38919, factor = 99.9794% within 2ms = 38927, factor = 100% deviation = 0.0216797
proc.log: cpu_hz = 2.0885e+09 cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645114 total latency = 1.953125 ms cpu latency = 1.562500 ms max diff = 2.96921 ms (overrun 0) within 1ms = 15422, factor = 99.987% within 2ms = 15424, factor = 100% deviation = 0.0223192
diskwrite.log: cpu_hz = 2.0885e+09 cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645226 total latency = 1.953125 ms cpu latency = 1.562500 ms max diff = 4.64053 ms (overrun 2) within 1ms = 13345, factor = 99.9176% within 2ms = 13354, factor = 99.985% deviation = 0.0517744
diskcopy.log: cpu_hz = 2.0885e+09 cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 644902 total latency = 1.953125 ms cpu latency = 1.562500 ms max diff = 3.45113 ms (overrun 0) within 1ms = 40427, factor = 99.9357% within 2ms = 40453, factor = 100% deviation = 0.0407751
diskread.log: cpu_hz = 2.0885e+09 cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 644972 total latency = 1.953125 ms cpu latency = 1.562500 ms max diff = 3.2573 ms (overrun 0) within 1ms = 38383, factor = 99.9401% within 2ms = 38406, factor = 100% deviation = 0.0324159
Marcus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |