lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 of March 2004 00:21, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
>>
>>>Yep. It scares me to think what performance characteristics we'll start
>>>seeing once that gets used everywhere it's needed, though. If every raw
>>>or O_DIRECT write needs a flush after it, databases are going to become
>>>very sensitive to flush performance. I guess disabling the flushing and
>>>using disks which tell the truth about data hitting the platter is the
>>>sane answer there.
>>
>>For IDE, O_DIRECT and O_SYNC can use special "FUA" commands, which don't
>>return until the data is on the platter.
>
>
> Do you know of any drive supporting it? I don't.


Newer SATAs do...

Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.083 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site