Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:31:25 +0800 | From | "Michael Frank" <> | Subject | Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] |
| |
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:46:28 +1200, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi. > > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 18:22, Michael Frank wrote: >> Error messages should be handled on a seperate VT eliminating the issue. > > While I definitely like the idea, I'm not sure that's feasible; as Pavel > pointed out, Suspend doesn't generate all the error messages that might > possibly appear. Maybe I'm just ignorant.. I'll take a look when I get > the change.
printk is central and could do the switch when swsusp is active
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |