Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:31:26 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.4-mm1 |
| |
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote: > > I checked and tried several things, and I think CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR is > a red herring. 2.6.4-mm1 did boot with CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR = Y or N as > long as kernel preemption is disabled. It did not boot regardless of > CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR if kernel preemption is enabled. I see the > complaints > bad: scheduling while atomic! > at various spots.
Please delete the spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); five lines from the end of fs/mpage.c.
I assume Subodh did that, but all we know is that it "doesn't boot".
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |