Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:29:47 +0100 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.23aa2 (bugfixes and important VM improvements for the high end) |
| |
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:39:24 +0100 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> you're wrong about s/vm_next/rb_next()/, walking the tree like in > get_unmapped_area would require recurisve algos w/o vm_next, or > significant heap allocations. that's the only thing vm_next is needed > for (i.e. to walk the tree in order efficiently). only if we drop all > tree walks than we can nuke vm_next.
Not sure what you mean here. rb_next() is not recursive.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |