Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:58:19 +0100 | From | Jean Delvare <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 2.6] sensor chips sysfs interface change (long) |
| |
> I would like to further suggest the renaming of 'sensor<n>' to > 'temp<n>_sensor' or 'temp<n>_type', in the interest of being > consistent.
Correct. I was precisely thinking of something similar :) For the sake of completeness, here is the list of renames that I plan to do:
temp<n>_hyst -> temp<n>_max_hyst or temp<n>_crit_hyst sensor<n> -> temp<n>_type pwm<n> -> fan<n>_pwm pwm<n>_enable -> fan<n>_pwm_enable vid -> in<n>_ref
I think that this should define a self-explanatory and easily extendable interface. There are a few "technical" terms remaining (in, pwm, vrm), but since these are the words used in the sensors domain, I feel like we better keep them as they are.
Thanks a lot for your constructive comment, I appreciate that.
-- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |