Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:33:56 +0000 | Subject | Re: pnp missing proc entries? | From | Mark Hindley <> |
| |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:24:14AM +0000, Adam Belay wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:44:14AM +0000, Mark Hindley wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just switched to 2.6 and am trying to resolve and irq conflict > > between a sound card and internal modem. > > Is the pnp layer complaining about this conflict? Are you using pnpbios > support? Are both the sound card and internal modem isapnp devices?
Both are internal -- Rockwell/ALS100. I get no complaints from the pnp layer, other than a refusal to config one if the other modules is loaded. Both want to use irq 5. I have pnpbios in too.
I have just fixed a problem with unloading the 8250_pnp module, so am hoping I can delve into this a bit more.
It seems that pnp is only trying the first config option for the device and then bailing out if that won't fit with what else is setup.
Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |