lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GFS requirements (was: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range)
On 2004-02-20T22:16:09,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> said:

> I presume you meant "DFS". I can't comment on the details of the plan
> for GFS just now, however consider OpenGFS: yes, it needs and has a
> cluster infrastructure. The kernel does not dictate anything about
> that infrastructure. Each DFS is free to implement its own
> infrastructure, possibly involving kernel extensions.

Yes. Though I do reserve the right to find this highly silly, that we
might end up with multiple hooks for clustering infrastructure in the
kernel...

So, how does OpenGFS/GFS achieve the communication? How does it interact
with the infrastructure (which, I infere from your above comments, is
meant to reside in user-space)?


Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

--
High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.108 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site