Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:05:46 -0500 | From | Jim Nelson <> | Subject | Re: kernel development environment |
| |
Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > >> On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 22:40 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> >>> Lee Revell wrote: >>> >>>> In case you did not get the joke, Mozilla Mail is one of the WORST mail >>>> clients for handling kernel patches. See the list archives. >>> >>> >>> Mozilla works fine if you send patches as attachments. >>> >> >> >> I still say it's broken. >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/22/488 > > > so don't use copy-paste. that idea is broken. > > otoh, netscape/mozilla/thunderbird mail > all work fine (except that attachments are required, > instead of being able to insert patches inline). >
After inadvertently helping to discover the bug in Mozilla, I use the sendpatchset script written by Paul Jackson at:
http://www.speakeasy.org/~pj99/sgi/sendpatchset
That lets people's patch-collecting scripts work properly, since (apparently) most of the m choke on the MIME headers from attachments.
If you need to connect directly to your ISP, Paul sent me a fix I can forward. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |