Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.10-rc3 | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Sun, 05 Dec 2004 15:07:16 +1100 |
| |
> Why was that changed? Are you sure it's not just a bug higher up > in the call stack? Classically(*), both suspend() and resume() > methods are called in contexts that can sleep, so that's a big > change I'd expect to impact other drivers too. In fact that'd > explain a lot of other messages I saw reported on the list...
Yes, lots of drivers are expected to be able to schedule in suspend and resume requests. If that was broken upstream, then this is a big BUG.
> - Dave > > (*) Since APM days if not before. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |