lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Proposal for a userspace "architecture portability" library
From
Date
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 11:53 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:

> Some of our kernel headers implement generally useful abstractions
> across all of the architectures we support. I would like to make an
> "architecture portability" library, based on the kernel headers but as
> a separate project from the kernel, and intended for use in userspace.

I think that this is an _awesome_ idea. Might want to check out what
overlap there is with existing glibc interfaces. For example, I presume
that glibc implements at least some of the atomic operations (but I also
think having a full suite of atomic operations available is useful).

Some of the stuff, like semaphores, isn't really going to port very well
to user-space. At least not directly, I would not think.

But on numerous occasions I have wanted the kernel's barriers, atomic
operations, bitwise operations, or some of the compiler things we
implement (likely, unlikely, fixes) in user-space.

> Now, clearly I can do this under the GPL. However, I think it would
> be more useful to have the library under the LGPL, which requires
> either getting the permission of the authors of the kernel files, or
> rewriting them from scratch.

FWIW, you have my permission. I've touched spinlock.h a bunch.

Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.037 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site