Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:22:58 +0530 | From | Ravikiran G Thirumalai <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Reimplementation of linux dynamic percpu memory allocator |
| |
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:33:44PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > >On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > > >>No, not fast path. But it can happen a few thousand times. The slab > >>implementation failed due to heavy internal fragmentation. If your code > >>runs fine with a few thousand users, then there shouldn't be a problem. > >> > >> > > > > > > > Could you ask Badari Pulavarty (pbadari@us.ibm.com)? > He noticed the fragmentation problem with the original > kmem_cache_alloc_node implementation. Perhaps he could just run your > version with his test setup:
Yes I will. Thanks for the pointer.
Thanks, Kiran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |