lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Reimplementation of linux dynamic percpu memory allocator
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:33:44PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >
> >
> >>No, not fast path. But it can happen a few thousand times. The slab
> >>implementation failed due to heavy internal fragmentation. If your code
> >>runs fine with a few thousand users, then there shouldn't be a problem.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Could you ask Badari Pulavarty (pbadari@us.ibm.com)?
> He noticed the fragmentation problem with the original
> kmem_cache_alloc_node implementation. Perhaps he could just run your
> version with his test setup:

Yes I will. Thanks for the pointer.


Thanks,
Kiran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.040 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site