Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Dec 2004 19:09:17 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fix conflicting cpu_idle() declarations |
| |
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:55:16AM +0900, Hirokazu Takata wrote: > I think it is OK for m32r. > BTW, you moved the definition of cpu_idle() to smp.h. > It may not be included from arch/*/process.c in some archs. > Is it OK?
It should be okay to include even on UP-only arches, IIRC it has stubs for UP versions of various locking primitives etc. used widely throughout the kernel.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |