Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:50:01 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:23:50 PST, "David S. Miller" said:
> If we are really going to do something like this, it should > be calculated properly and be determined per-interface > type as netdevs are registered.
Would you prefer to see this done for all interface types if we do it at all, or would a special-case for 1 or 2 types that can use a slab without being wasteful be an acceptable solution? (Let's face it - if 3.95 objects fit in each slab, we may not want to do it...) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |