lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:23:50 PST, "David S. Miller" said:

    > If we are really going to do something like this, it should
    > be calculated properly and be determined per-interface
    > type as netdevs are registered.

    Would you prefer to see this done for all interface types if we do it
    at all, or would a special-case for 1 or 2 types that can use a slab
    without being wasteful be an acceptable solution? (Let's face it - if
    3.95 objects fit in each slab, we may not want to do it...)
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:3.400 / U:0.156 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site