Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:35:08 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED |
| |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > Its not that they just enable it. Its that it has side effects. I enable it to support > > one device - it then 'devnaps' other devices that usbstorage supports _much_ > > better. Is there some way it could work in reverse. eg. let ub bind only if > > usbstorage does not, possibly making usbstorage a _little_ more conservative > > if ub is present? > > Unfortunately there isn't any way to define which driver should bind to a > device, if they are both capable of controlling it. Maybe there should > be. It might not be too hard to add a sysfs interface for that sort of > thing.
We are working on it...
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |