Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:34:52 -0500 | From | Ben Collins <> | Subject | Re: linux1394 patches merged |
| |
> Since neither "raw1394" nor "video1394" are drivers specific to the > devices they define matches for, no other ( specialized ) driver can > ever get a device object. I am developing a v4l2 driver for the IIDC > cameras which is based on the "video-2-1394" driver which again is > designed around the device object and the callbacks of the ieee1394 bus > driver. This driver never gets loaded since "raw1394" is the first match > for the device signature and I had to patch "raw1394" and "video1394" > not to match on anything.
Maybe we need some sort of priority for device matching, or maybe a "generic" to "specific" probing model.
-- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |