Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Nov 2004 07:44:11 -0500 (EST) | From | linux-os <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] kill IN_STRING_C |
| |
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 05:57:12PM -0500, linux-os wrote: >> ... >> call strcpy >> ... >> strcpy: >> subl $8, %esp >> ... >> It clearly invents strcpy, having never been referenced in the >> source. > > The asm code you sent does _not_ call a global strcpy function. > It calls an asm procedure named "strcpy" it ships itself. > > BTW: You are the second person in this thread I have to explain this to... > >> Cheers, >> Dick Johnson > > cu > Adrian
Explain WHAT? There is NO strcpy in the code. No such procedure should have been called. Period. The generated code is defective.
Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.9 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips). Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by John Ashcroft. 98.36% of all statistics are fiction. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |