Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:59:11 +0100 | From | Christian Kujau <> | Subject | Re: Oops in 2.6.10-rc1 |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds schrieb: > > No, just gut feel. If the pre-merge ALSA works, and the post-merge one > doesn't, and the oops in both cases happen somewhere close to where it > does "pci_enable_device()", there's not a lot left. There are interrupts, > and there is the PCI layer...
yes, makes sense.
>> >>i did "bk undo -a1.2463" from a current -BK tree and it oopses: > > Note that "bk undo -axxx" will _leave_ xxx in place, and undo everything > after. > > So what you did still has the merge in the tree, and that it still oopses > is thus to be expected. BUT, we're getting closer.
yes, i think i understood that. that's why i wanted to revert 1.2463 too.
[...]
> > Now, that's fine - the USB merge is likely to be ok, so try doing > > bk undo -a1.2462
for now i appreciate your work here but i have to postpone the the "bk revtool" stuff because i have no X _and_ bk here. (but i'm a good student and will do my homework)
> and you will now have a tree that is exactly the same as before, except it > does _not_ have the PCI merge from Greg. > > And if this one does not oops, you can now officially blame Greg.
i can't wait... ;)
>> Now, if you want to get _really_ fancy, you can now look at each changeset > that differed, with something like > > bk set -n -d -r1.2462 -r1.2463 | bk -R prs -h -d'<:P:@:HOST:>\n$each(:C:){\t(:C:)\n}\n' - > > which is black magic that does a set operation and shows all the changes > in between the sets of "bk at 1.2462" and "bk at 1.2463". > > (This is _not_ the same as "bk changes -r1.2462..1.2463", because that one > just shows the single merge change that is on the direct _path_ from one > changeset to another. The black magic thing shows the set difference of > changesets that comes from the full graph at two points). > > Then you can look at each change individually and see if they matter.
will do, after the build
> > And once you can do the set operations, you're officially a BK poweruser. > Me, I just have a script, I'm a BK dabbler. > > Looking at the list (appended), I don't see anything obvious, but hey, if > it was obvious it wouldn't have been merged in the first place. > > Thanks for your willingness to pursue this thing,
hey, thanks to you and to the folks in the Cc: field to chase a bug which only _i_ encounter until now.
/me is building now.... thanks, Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #111:
The salesman drove over the CPU board. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBj94f+A7rjkF8z0wRAm/uAJ0eTBa20JnX+250GpFiSED4b+arQwCggSgo CO/MQ+1jeOOvb7WaJRKg7uY= =Qlt1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |