lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers
Date
From
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com> said:

[...]

> I think you're missing the idea that that such drivers are
> _contributory_ infringement to the direct infringement that occurs when
> the user loads the module. In other words, even for a driver that has
> not a byte of code derived from the kernel, if all its uses involve it
> being loaded into a GPL'ed kernel to form an infringing derivative
> work in RAM by the user committing direct copyright infringement against
> numerous GPL'ed kernel components, then it fails the test of having
> a substantial non-infringing use, as established in the Betamax decision,
> and distributing it is contributory infringement of those GPL'ed
> components of the kernel.

This is nonsense: If so, I'd be commiting a crime each time I fire up emacs
on Solaris (linking (GPLed) emacs to (propietary) libc in RAM). [Yes, just
an example; haven't done so for the best part of 5 years now...]

Besides, Linus has _explicitly_ said that binary (closed source) modules
are OK (under certain conditions). And AFAIU there was legitimate
discussion wether this particular excemption was required at al.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.112 / U:1.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site