Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 09/20] uml: use SIG_IGN for empty sighandler | Date | Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:48:04 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> |
| |
blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it said: > I had a doubt on this, but I was not getting much feedback from you... Yeah, sorry.
> Also, if you reject this, I'd require a comment-only patch for it: "as > soon as I remember why" makes me think back to my yesterday's class, > when the teacher said "put comments in your code or you'll soon > forget what it does!" 8-O (yes, 1st year University student :-( ).
The thing is, you often don't realize what's going to be mysterious until it actually is, and then it's too late for the comment :-)
In this case, it wants to be bounced out of sigprocmask when a SIGWINCH arrives. In order to do so, it must have a handler registered, even if it does nothing.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |