lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] dynamic syscalls revisited
>> I've seen previous attempts to get dynamic system calls into the kernel
>> and they just get dumped, but usually with good reason. They require a
>> change to all architectures quite drastically and is usually a problem
>> implementing them for the module to use them.
>
>Actually they were dumped because dynamically syscalls are a really bad
>idea, not because of implementation issues.

I do not see how dsyscalls could be better than static ones, so they are
one-on-one. Maybe someone could elaborate why they are "a really bad idea"?



Jan Engelhardt
--
Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung
Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.080 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site