Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:41:30 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] dynamic syscalls revisited |
| |
>> I've seen previous attempts to get dynamic system calls into the kernel >> and they just get dumped, but usually with good reason. They require a >> change to all architectures quite drastically and is usually a problem >> implementing them for the module to use them. > >Actually they were dumped because dynamically syscalls are a really bad >idea, not because of implementation issues.
I do not see how dsyscalls could be better than static ones, so they are one-on-one. Maybe someone could elaborate why they are "a really bad idea"?
Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |