Messages in this thread | | | From | Duncan Sands <> | Subject | Re: sparse segfaults | Date | Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:30:45 +0100 |
| |
> I suspect (but don't have any real argument to back that up) is that the > gcc "extended lvalues" fell out as a side effect from how gcc ended up > doing some random semantic tree parsing, and it wasn't really "designed" > per se, as much as just a random implementation detail. Then somebody > noticed it, and said "cool" and documented it.
Generalized lvalues have been removed. Check out http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00604.html
All the best,
Duncan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |