Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:33:44 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ? |
| |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Hi Evgeniy, > > Hello, Adrian.
Hi Evgeniy,
> > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains: > > obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490) += ds9490r.o > > ds9490r-objs := dscore.o > > > > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ? > > dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip. > ds9490* is built on top of it. > Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip, > not ds9490.
if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain additional object files.
How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in drivers/w1/Makefile?
> Evgeniy Polyakov
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |