Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:43:08 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: Why INSTALL_PATH is not /boot by default? |
| |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:27:15AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > This line, in the main Makefile, is commented: > > export INSTALL_PATH=/boot > > Why? It seems pointless, since almost everything has been for ages requiring > this settings, and distros' versions of installkernel have been taking an > empty INSTALL_PATH as meaning /boot for ages (for instance Mandrake). It's > maybe even mandated by the FHS (dunno). > > Is there any reason I'm missing?
Changing this may have impact on default behaviour of some versions of installkernel. If /boot is ok for other than just i386 we can give it a try.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |