Messages in this thread | | | From | Gene Heskett <> | Subject | Re: [patch] inotify: idr stuff | Date | Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:52:35 -0400 |
| |
On Monday 01 November 2004 15:28, Robert Love wrote: >John. > >MAX_ID_MASK is already set to the maximum IDR value, so we don't > need to add IDR_MAX_ID. I know this was my idea--I was, uh, being >metaphoric. :) > >Plus, MAX_ID_MASK is computed based on IDR_BITS, so it is "always >right." > >Also add an IWATCHES_HARD_LIMIT, set to MAX_ID_MASK, instead of > using MAX_ID_MASK directly. > >Finally, this uncovers that idr.h is not protected against double >inclusion, so wrap it in ifndef's. > >Best, > > Robert Love
Anybody know whats going on, I just got 8 copies of this [...]
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.28% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |