lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.10-rc2
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:01:00PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:59:00AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Nope. It got fixed differently: by only adding POSIX locks to the list.
> > See locks_insert_block(). Since a non-posix lock cannot be blocked by a
> > POSIX lock, the "if (IS_POSIX(blocker))" test should make sure we're
> > always proper.
> >
> > At least that's Willy claims. If you think he's wrong, holler.
> >
> > Willy Cc'd, once more.
>
> The problem certainly should have been fixed. I'd like to know if it
> still occurs.
>

It does not, thank you.

~
:wq
With best regards,
Vladimir Savkin.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.104 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site