lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:14:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >And if you want to support both older and more recent kernels, the
> >following dependencies will be correct both before and after this
> >change:
> >- (X86 && !X86_64)
> >- (X86 && X86_64)
> >
>
> This last one surely can't be correct before *and* afterwards. But even in
> the current system, it is a pretty perverse thing to check for. I guess you
> meant:
>
> (X86 || X86_64)

Yes, thanks for the correcting my typo.

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.101 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site