Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:19:08 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86 |
| |
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:14:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > >And if you want to support both older and more recent kernels, the > >following dependencies will be correct both before and after this > >change: > >- (X86 && !X86_64) > >- (X86 && X86_64) > > > > This last one surely can't be correct before *and* afterwards. But even in > the current system, it is a pretty perverse thing to check for. I guess you > meant: > > (X86 || X86_64)
Yes, thanks for the correcting my typo.
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |