Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:00:51 +0100 | From | Tomas Carnecky <> | Subject | Re: Kernel thoughts of a Linux user |
| |
Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote: > - Replace DRI with sth. slimmer and intoduce real kernel drivers > and introduce real kernel drivers which handel all the initialization and > interrupt handling (only minimal hardware abstraction). One goal is to > remove X.org's PCI magic. Ultimately this shall give framebuffer and X > the same basis. This was summarized on kerneltrap.org.
Is it possible to have two or more 'workstations' on one computer? A 'workstation' is a monitor, keyboard, mouse etc. tied together and represents a place where someone can work. I know it's possible to do this using a Xserver (running two Xservers on different virtual consoles, each with its own configuration/keyboard/mouse/monitor), but I'd like to realise it more low-level, on the level of virtual terminals, so that each 'workstation' would have it's own 'Ctrl+F1', 'Ctrl+F2' etc.
Background: Today, you can buy video cards with two connectors for monitors, or even put two of those cards into one mainboard, making it possible to connect four monitors to one computer. A P4 HT enabled CPU would be enough for four office workers who edit text documents, unless they aren't playing games :) So you could cut costs by buying one set of Mainboard/CPU/RAM and then for every worker just a monitor/keyboard/mouse. Places like internet-cafes could profit, they usually have many same computers side by side, each with the same configuration, but on many no one is working, they just run and consume energy.
tom
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |