lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] VM routine fixes


On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, David Howells wrote:
>
> So not having an MMU, page tables or PTEs or any requirement for operations
> that act upon them is not enough?

No. It's a matter of abstraction. If you can _abstract_ the thing away,
that's fine. I don't want more #ifdef's in source code, but you can have a
totally different file that doesnt' do the things that aren't appropriate
for non-MMU.

Yes, we've already got #ifdef's in code, but the point is that we don't
add them unless there is serious _need_. And even then it's a sign of
trouble. In this case, the sign of trouble is bigger than the need.
uClinux might as well have a dummy "struct vm_operations", if only to make
the damn thing look more like real Linux.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.086 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site